<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inflation &#8211; not Deflation &#8211; is the Threat, Now Here&#8217;s What  to do About it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geigerindex.com/archives/inflation-not-deflation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geigerindex.com/archives/inflation-not-deflation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:11:30 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jutia Group - Market Jitters &#38; Political Critters</title>
		<link>http://www.geigerindex.com/archives/inflation-not-deflation/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Jutia Group - Market Jitters &#38; Political Critters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=3632#comment-190</guid>
		<description>[...] future is thus one of rapidly increasing inflation, combined with a healthy recovery in global demand, at least in the emerging markets, as Europe and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] future is thus one of rapidly increasing inflation, combined with a healthy recovery in global demand, at least in the emerging markets, as Europe and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five Ways to Profit from the New Year Rebound in Commodity Prices</title>
		<link>http://www.geigerindex.com/archives/inflation-not-deflation/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Five Ways to Profit from the New Year Rebound in Commodity Prices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=3632#comment-191</guid>
		<description>[...] future is thus one of rapidly increasing inflation, combined with a healthy recovery in global demand, at least in the emerging markets, as Europe and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] future is thus one of rapidly increasing inflation, combined with a healthy recovery in global demand, at least in the emerging markets, as Europe and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Investors May Be Too Optimistic About Consumer Recovery</title>
		<link>http://www.geigerindex.com/archives/inflation-not-deflation/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Investors May Be Too Optimistic About Consumer Recovery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 10:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=3632#comment-189</guid>
		<description>[...] Inflation – not Deflation – is the Threat, Now Here’s What to do About it  (Money Morning, 12/8/08) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Inflation – not Deflation – is the Threat, Now Here’s What to do About it  (Money Morning, 12/8/08) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James MacInnis</title>
		<link>http://www.geigerindex.com/archives/inflation-not-deflation/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>James MacInnis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=3632#comment-188</guid>
		<description>Velocity refers to the velocity of circulation, (the number of times a dollar exchanges hands in an economy). It is influenced by the price level (P). The equation states that Y or (GDP) equals the Quantity of money (M) multipled by the velocity of circulation (MV=PY).

If the quantity of money(M) is $300 Billion and the velocity of money (V) is 5, GDP or MV equals $1.5 trillion since 5 x $300 billion = $1.5 trillion. Therefore GDP or (Y)= $1.5 trillion.

Where the money supply is increased or decreased the velocity of circulation is influenced by the the price level (P).
If increases in the quantity of money (M) are not accompanied by increases in production, prices rise because too much paper is chasing too few goods (Demand pull or classic inflation). However where increases in the money supply are in response to increases in productivity, in the short run, real wealth increases without acompanying inflation.
    However, in the long run, as a result of continuing increases in real wealth and productivity along with increases in the money supply, competition for labor places upward pressure on wages and prices leading to cost push inflation.
   A wage, price and income policy as opposed to monetary policy would work to control cost push inflation but it is politically unpopular, therefore moneytary policy used and this is accompanied by recessions. In conclusion, classic inflation ( too many dollars chasing too few goods) can only be controlled by monetary policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Velocity refers to the velocity of circulation, (the number of times a dollar exchanges hands in an economy). It is influenced by the price level (P). The equation states that Y or (GDP) equals the Quantity of money (M) multipled by the velocity of circulation (MV=PY).</p>
<p>If the quantity of money(M) is $300 Billion and the velocity of money (V) is 5, GDP or MV equals $1.5 trillion since 5 x $300 billion = $1.5 trillion. Therefore GDP or (Y)= $1.5 trillion.</p>
<p>Where the money supply is increased or decreased the velocity of circulation is influenced by the the price level (P).<br />
If increases in the quantity of money (M) are not accompanied by increases in production, prices rise because too much paper is chasing too few goods (Demand pull or classic inflation). However where increases in the money supply are in response to increases in productivity, in the short run, real wealth increases without acompanying inflation.<br />
    However, in the long run, as a result of continuing increases in real wealth and productivity along with increases in the money supply, competition for labor places upward pressure on wages and prices leading to cost push inflation.<br />
   A wage, price and income policy as opposed to monetary policy would work to control cost push inflation but it is politically unpopular, therefore moneytary policy used and this is accompanied by recessions. In conclusion, classic inflation ( too many dollars chasing too few goods) can only be controlled by monetary policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James MacInnis</title>
		<link>http://www.geigerindex.com/archives/inflation-not-deflation/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>James MacInnis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 23:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=3632#comment-187</guid>
		<description>The metaphore, you can pull a brick across a table with a piece of string but you cannot push it in the opposite direction is quite true. Increasing the money supply and lowering interest rates is not going to entice people to borrow or purchase goods and services they cannot afford.

In spite of the fact that there is more money then ever before, the global economy is slowing. Much of the money is counterfit because it is not backed up by productivity.
   Deflation is due to a decline in agregate demand. As demand falls producers are forced to lower prices. If this continues prices will fall to where it is not economical to produce and deflation places downward pressure on resource based economies as well. ( The collapse of oil prices is reeking havoc on the Soviet union). As the global economy rachets downward and inventories get used up, the shortage of goods will no doubt lead to inflation.

This is an international global problem and it will take international cooperation to deal with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The metaphore, you can pull a brick across a table with a piece of string but you cannot push it in the opposite direction is quite true. Increasing the money supply and lowering interest rates is not going to entice people to borrow or purchase goods and services they cannot afford.</p>
<p>In spite of the fact that there is more money then ever before, the global economy is slowing. Much of the money is counterfit because it is not backed up by productivity.<br />
   Deflation is due to a decline in agregate demand. As demand falls producers are forced to lower prices. If this continues prices will fall to where it is not economical to produce and deflation places downward pressure on resource based economies as well. ( The collapse of oil prices is reeking havoc on the Soviet union). As the global economy rachets downward and inventories get used up, the shortage of goods will no doubt lead to inflation.</p>
<p>This is an international global problem and it will take international cooperation to deal with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Abramsky</title>
		<link>http://www.geigerindex.com/archives/inflation-not-deflation/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Abramsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=3632#comment-186</guid>
		<description>Well Meltzer has a point. However so does every other pundit who claims deflation is not a long term threat. Yes, inflation will be a short term factor and in truth &quot;some&quot; of the money will find it&#039;s way into the market. Notice I quote &quot;some&quot; money. Meltzer needs to refresh himself on what &quot;debt deflation is&quot;. The fact he&#039;s an economist (which means he&#039;s and academic) tells me everything I need to know. He bases his claims on traditional ways that money supply has worked on economies. You print money and prices go up right? Wrong.
       I wager a bet he wasn&#039;t around during the great depression to see that money printing had no effect on changing the course of &quot;debt deflation&quot; which is not to be confused with deflation by itself. It is not necessarily a bad thing to have prices for goods more affordable. However when pricing falls as a result of deleverage and bad debt, this on the other hand is not good. Meltzer would know that in deflation alone when a price falls to a specified level you will find a willing buyer who believes that price to be a deal. However when you are bankrupt you don&#039;t have cash to buy the item even if it were a deal and low and behold you can&#039;t get credit to subsidize your purchase either. What happens next? Prices continue to fall as supply and demand have very little correlation when debt is being realed in. In essence it&#039;s a balance sheet problem isn&#039;t it? Not a supply and demand problem or a money printing solution. Fear and greed move the markets. These emtions are directly related to why people buy anything. They are also the reasons why markets rarely if ever behave rationally. It is why they are not predictable.
     How often are economists right about any market timing bottom or high? I don&#039;t think you need me to state the answer. I rest my case.

Cheers.

Marc Abramsky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Meltzer has a point. However so does every other pundit who claims deflation is not a long term threat. Yes, inflation will be a short term factor and in truth &#8220;some&#8221; of the money will find it&#8217;s way into the market. Notice I quote &#8220;some&#8221; money. Meltzer needs to refresh himself on what &#8220;debt deflation is&#8221;. The fact he&#8217;s an economist (which means he&#8217;s and academic) tells me everything I need to know. He bases his claims on traditional ways that money supply has worked on economies. You print money and prices go up right? Wrong.<br />
       I wager a bet he wasn&#8217;t around during the great depression to see that money printing had no effect on changing the course of &#8220;debt deflation&#8221; which is not to be confused with deflation by itself. It is not necessarily a bad thing to have prices for goods more affordable. However when pricing falls as a result of deleverage and bad debt, this on the other hand is not good. Meltzer would know that in deflation alone when a price falls to a specified level you will find a willing buyer who believes that price to be a deal. However when you are bankrupt you don&#8217;t have cash to buy the item even if it were a deal and low and behold you can&#8217;t get credit to subsidize your purchase either. What happens next? Prices continue to fall as supply and demand have very little correlation when debt is being realed in. In essence it&#8217;s a balance sheet problem isn&#8217;t it? Not a supply and demand problem or a money printing solution. Fear and greed move the markets. These emtions are directly related to why people buy anything. They are also the reasons why markets rarely if ever behave rationally. It is why they are not predictable.<br />
     How often are economists right about any market timing bottom or high? I don&#8217;t think you need me to state the answer. I rest my case.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
<p>Marc Abramsky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph D. Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.geigerindex.com/archives/inflation-not-deflation/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph D. Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=3632#comment-182</guid>
		<description>With all the loop holes and tax breaks for the wealthy for the last 8 yrs suggest  deflation sinec wealth is relative. The increased nation debt suggest inflation since that is the only way the nation can keep from going completely bankrupt. Still confused</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the loop holes and tax breaks for the wealthy for the last 8 yrs suggest  deflation sinec wealth is relative. The increased nation debt suggest inflation since that is the only way the nation can keep from going completely bankrupt. Still confused</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Kish</title>
		<link>http://www.geigerindex.com/archives/inflation-not-deflation/comment-page-1/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Kish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=3632#comment-179</guid>
		<description>While I agree TIPS are a very good value at this time, I feel that Treasuries are on the cusp of a large decline.  If Treasuries take a dive, I&#039;m afraid TIPs will get very wet too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree TIPS are a very good value at this time, I feel that Treasuries are on the cusp of a large decline.  If Treasuries take a dive, I&#8217;m afraid TIPs will get very wet too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Good Article on Inflation at MoneyMorning.com &#124; Home-Buddies</title>
		<link>http://www.geigerindex.com/archives/inflation-not-deflation/comment-page-1/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Good Article on Inflation at MoneyMorning.com &#124; Home-Buddies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=3632#comment-183</guid>
		<description>[...] (Read the full article&#8230;) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Read the full article&#8230;) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.geigerindex.com/archives/inflation-not-deflation/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=3632#comment-184</guid>
		<description>Good article. The inflationary pressures, history, and the ridiculous government&#039;s magical money make inflation much more of a concern than deflation.

I featured your article on my site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article. The inflationary pressures, history, and the ridiculous government&#8217;s magical money make inflation much more of a concern than deflation.</p>
<p>I featured your article on my site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
