<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Geiger Index &#187; Election 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geigerindex.com/category/election-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geigerindex.com</link>
	<description>The Geiger Index is a &#34;black box&#34; system based on non-linear models. Editor Keith Fitz-Gerald has spent over 10 years refining some very remarkable algorithms… Now he&#039;s put these into a program that monitors the markets. His Geiger Index can predict with a very high degree of accuracy where the market will be trading within the next 30, 60 or even 90 days.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:19:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Election 2008: Why Poor Presidential Approval Ratings Make For Great Stock Markets</title>
		<link>http://www.geigerindex.com/archives/poor-presidential-approval-ratings-make-great-stock-markets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geigerindex.com/archives/poor-presidential-approval-ratings-make-great-stock-markets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 06:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Fitz-Gerald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Fitz-Gerald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Essay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/06/20/election-2008-why-poor-presidential-approval-ratings-make-for-great-stock-markets/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Keith Fitz-Gerald Investment Director Money Morning/The Money Map Report No question, President George Bush&#8217;s approval ratings have pulled an &#8220;Enron.&#8221; A recent Associated Press-Ipsos poll conducted June 12-16 showed only 29% of the public gave Bush a favorable rating. It&#8217;s the least favorable approval rating for a U.S. president since Jimmy Carter&#8217;s approval rating [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><body></p>
<h3><strong>By Keith Fitz-Gerald</strong><br />
    <strong>Investment Director</strong><br />
    <strong>Money Morning/The Money Map Report</strong></h3>
<p>No question,  President George Bush&#8217;s approval ratings have pulled an &#8220;Enron.&#8221;</p>
<p>A recent <strong><em>Associated  Press-Ipsos</em></strong> poll conducted June 12-16 showed only 29% of the public  gave Bush a favorable rating. It&#8217;s the least favorable <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approval_rating#cite_note-2">approval rating  for a U.S. president</a> since <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_carter">Jimmy Carter&#8217;s</a> approval  rating dropped to just 22%.</p>
<p>While that lousy  view of the job Bush is doing will help set up a more-contentious election in  November, here&#8217;s a curious fact that investors will find quite rewarding:&nbsp; The key to better stock-market returns isn&#8217;t  having a president we &#8220;love&#8221; &#8211; it&#8217;s having a president that we don&#8217;t quite  hate.</p>
<p>Let me explain.</p>
<p>According to a  study of presidential approval ratings by <strong><em><a href="http://www.ndr.com/invest/public/publichome.action">Ned Davis Research</a> </em></strong>that looks back all the way to the days of President <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_f._kennedy">John F. Kennedy</a>, when  the president&#8217;s approval rating is below 35%, as it is now, the <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=983582">Dow Jones Industrial  Average Index</a> loses an average of 5.9% per year. When times are good and  presidential approval ratings exceed 65%, the Dow rises at an annualized rate  of 2.6%. But when just 50%-65% of the public gives a favorable rating, the  markets do a bit better and the Dow rises at a 5.4% annualized clip.                                                                                        [<a target="_blank" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/pdf/PresidentialRatingsDow1.pdf">Click here for the full chart on how the Dow has performed during different presidential administrations.</a>]</p>
<p>Now here&#8217;s the  really interesting part.</p>
<p>When the  majority of Americans <em>disapprove</em> of how the president&#8217;s doing his job,  and the approval rating clocks in between 35%-50%, the Dow posts an average  annualized gain of 12.3%. In other words, when less than half the population  has a favorable view of a sitting president&#8217;s performance, the Dow&#8217;s upside  potential improves by 127.78%.</p>
<p>Talk about a  counter-intuitive result!</p>
<p>For next year,  then, it seems that the key isn&#8217;t for us to elect a president that everybody  likes; instead, the country needs to elect a president that the masses &#8220;hate&#8221; a  bit less than they dislike Bush and who only does his job well enough to garner  the support of between 35% and 50% of the population.</p>
<p>Anything worse,  and the Dow could fall, which given &#8220;The Dubya&#8217;s&#8221; current lackluster rating, is  right on track for how the markets are behaving lately.</p>
<p><b>Story continues below&#8230;</b></p>
<table align="center" style="background:#E0E7C2">
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sign up right now, and we&#8217;ll send you an important new report for free: &#8220;The Three Best Investments in Asia.&#8221;</font></strong>
	  </p>
<form method="post" action="http://www.aweber.com/scripts/addlead.pl">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_web_form_id" value="163867">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_split_id" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="unit" value="money-morning">
<input type="hidden" name="redirect" value="http://www.moneymorning.com/confirmsiup">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_redirect_onlist" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_adtracking" value="X300HJG4">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_message" value="1">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_required" value="from">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_forward_vars" value="0">
<form method="post" action="http://www.aweber.com/scripts/addlead.pl">
            <center> <img src="http://www.moneymorning.com/images2/MMSignUp.gif" /><br />
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><br />
      </font> </p>
<input type="submit" name="submit" value="Subscribe Now!" onClick="var s=s_gi(s_account); s.linkTrackVars='eVar2,eVar10,events'; s.linkTrackEvents='event3'; s.events='event3'; s.eVar10 ='620'; s.tl(this,'o','Subscribe to Newsletter');" />
<input type="text" name="from" value="" size="20" />
</center><br />
</form>
<p></font></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>And that has us  thinking: Who amongst the presidential contenders that are left do we like the  least?</p>
<p>    <u>[<strong>Editor's Note</strong></u><strong>: </strong><strong>This story is part of </strong><em><strong>Money  Morning's </strong></em><em>ongoing </em><strong>"Election  2008" </strong><em>series covering the  investing impacts of the presidential campaign.</em> Contributing Editor <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/contributors/">Martin Hutchinson</a> has  personally interviewed the economic advisors for candidates McCain, Obama and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Edwards">John Edwards</a> and concluded  that <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2007/12/21/election-2008-which-democratic-candidates-will-be-best-for-investor-profits/">Obama</a> and <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/01/03/election-2008-which-republican-candidates-will-be-best-for-investor-profits/">McCain</a> would be the best candidates for investors. For a full report on the  "presidential profit plays" that was derived from Hutchinson's research, <u><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/02/04/the-six-profit-plays-to-consider-as-%e2%80%9csuper-tuesday%e2%80%9d-plays-out/">please  click here</a></u>. The report is free of charge.]<br />
    <strong><u><br />
News and  Related Story Links:</u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Money Morning:<br />
  </strong><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/06/06/election-2008-obama-or-mccain-%e2%80%93-u.s.-may-suffer-either-way/">Election  2008: Obama or McCain &#8211; U.S. May Suffer Either Way</a></p>
</li>
<li><strong>Money Morning: </strong><br />
    <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/06/19/election-2008-the-achilles-heel-of-obamanomics/">Election  2008: The Achilles&#8217; Heel of Obamanomics</a></p>
</li>
<li><strong>Wikipedia</strong>:<br />
  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approval_rating#cite_note-2">United  States Presidential Approval Rating</a></p>
</li>
<li><strong>Website:</strong><br />
    <a href="http://www.ndr.com/invest/public/publichome.action">Ned Davis Research</a>
</li>
</ul>
<p></body><br />
</html></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geigerindex.com/archives/poor-presidential-approval-ratings-make-great-stock-markets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

